Validity of “Negation” and “Interrogatives” in Processability Theory for Iranian EFL Learners

Authors

  • Amir Hamzeh Gholami Rouintani
  • Abbas Bayat Department of English Language, Malayer Branch, Islamic Azad University, Malayer, Iran
  • Payman Rajabi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22452/jml.vol33no2.6

Keywords:

Higher Education, Second Language Acquisition, Processability Theory, Sequence of Acquisition, Negation, Interrogatives

Abstract

Processability Theory (PT), which organizes the knowledge base of Second Language Acquisition (SLA), offers an explanation of acquisition sequences. The aim of this paper is to investigate validation of PT for Iranian EFL learners for the acquisition of “negation” and “interrogative” structures across five proficiency levels and compared it with the morpho-syntactic structures model suggested by Pienemann. From the 160 participants having distinct proficiency, the needed data was gathered. They were wanted to produce example of oral performance in semi-structured interview and picture description tasks. The Kruskal-Wallis test pointed that both “negation” and “interrogative” emerge in agreement with the order of acquisition forcasted by Pienemann. In other words, as the participants’ level of proficiency level grew, so did their correct use of interrogatives and negation. Thus, PT is validated for EFL students, too.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Validity of “Negation” and “Interrogatives” in Processability Theory for Iranian EFL Learners

Downloads

Published

2023-12-19

How to Cite

Gholami Rouintani, A. H. ., Bayat, A., & Rajabi, payman. (2023). Validity of “Negation” and “Interrogatives” in Processability Theory for Iranian EFL Learners. Journal of Modern Languages, 33(2), 97–119. https://doi.org/10.22452/jml.vol33no2.6